Skip to main content

Focusing on the task at hand - what I learnt from the Gita

Modernity comes with anxiety.

While modern technological advancements may have eased our survival struggles, it certainly has raised the stakes in other areas of life. Contrary to the popular ‘snowflake’ thesis that paints millennials as spoilt brats of rich parents, millennials may actually have it going tougher for them, if sociologist Lisa Strohschein is to be believed. Add on top of this the constant pull of smartphones and social media, and you get a taste of the millennial anxiety recipe.

While anxiety may come in different colours and flavours, one peculiar kind comes with 'overthinking'. Every once in a while, I come across anxious people who proclaim themselves as overthinkers. For the uninitiated, this ‘overthinking’ isn’t to be equated with ‘deep thinking’ – when they say they are ‘overthinkers’, what they mean is they are anxious, clueless, and worried. 'Overthinking', at least the way this word is used in popular culture, is to be understood as lack of clarity in thought and perception - a highly diverged cognition.

Why this anxiety, by the way? Shouldn't 'thinking' be a noble pursuit? Shouldn't 'thinking' be a job we all should be doing relentlessly?

The verse

41st verse (second chapter) of the Bhagavad Gita may shed some light:

व्यवसायात्मिका बुद्धिरेकेह कुरुनन्दन |
बहुशाखा ह्यनन्ताश्च बुद्धयोऽव्यवसायिनाम् || 

vyavasāyātmikā buddhir ekeha kuru-nandana
bahu-śhākhā hyanantāśh cha buddhayo ’vyavasāyinām

-          Gita, Chapter 2, Verse 41

The verse describes the difference between a result-oriented approach, an approach that focuses too much on the results instead of the task at hand, and a task-oriented approach - an approach which focuses only on the task at hand and doesn’t worry much about the outcomes.

A result-oriented approach, which the scripture terms as ‘sakAma karma’, breeds anxiety, worry, and unproductive actions. It is filled with self-doubts and unsolicited excuses for everything. It takes the outcomes too personally, and is afraid to fail. It is jealous, timid, and easily distracted – because this approach is not focused on the task, but on the ‘ego’ that is associated with the outcomes of the task.

What Gita terms as ‘NishkAma karma’ is the task-oriented approach. It focuses on the task, not on the ‘ego’. The man, who is focused on the work at hand and not on the outcomes, will have resolute and unwavering thinking. Determination will come naturally to him, but not the obsession. Free from distractions and obsessions, his action will be marked by precision and strategy. He will not fail - because even if he fails, he will use that failure as a learning opportunity.

The Vedantic Approach

Gita is a Vedantic text – a text that builds on the philosophy propounded by the Vedas and the Upanishads. Vedantic philosophy considers self-knowledge as the way to cessation of sorrows and attainment of bliss (आत्यन्तिक दुःख निबृत्ति परमानन्द प्राप्ति). Therefore, the Vedantic approach to solving life’s problem is a top-down approach. Instead of focusing on individual problems and finding specific solutions to them, it believes that we can address the root cause of problems by having the right knowledge.

Following this approach, Gita finds the solution to anxiety and procrastination in a task-oriented approach. The problem lies not in laziness or lack of clarity, but in our approach to individual tasks. 

Popular posts

Citing Legal Materials Using Bluebook - A Short Guide

© Anshuman Sahoo 2017.  Free for mass distribution till the source is properly mentioned. So, you collected the relevant materials for your research, went through them carefully, and evaluated the available materials. Now, what remains is to carefully dot down your arguments in your own words while supporting those arguments and ideas by citing relevant materials in the footnotes. It is necessary to cite relevant legal material that you have referred to because it reflects your research and in-depth study that you have undertaken to write that paper. Apart from that, while quoting the work of someone else, citation is necessary to avoid possible allegations of plagiarism. However, while citing the materials in the footnotes section, you cannot cite them as per your wish. For example, while citing page no. 99 of ‘The Start-up of You’ book written by Reid Hoffman, you cannot cite it as ‘page 99, The Start-up of You, Reid Hoffmann’ just because that seems convenient. There is

A journey called Law School: Few words for the newcomers

Law school has its own ways to teach us the needed, regardless of our consent or interest thereto! However, gradually, through the ups and downs of our journey, it seems that while there are some things that we can change, there also exist some things that need to be accepted. I have had my fair share of ‘law school experiences’ to enable me to write this piece. However, I cannot guarantee that you’ll be having the same experiences through your journey. Therefore, inapplicability regretted. So, shall we start? 1. You’ll be facing tough competitions. Yes, cutthroat competition. You’ll compete with unfaithful friends and sincere enemies. Be prepared to be betrayed, used, and knocked out. However, don’t let this affect you. Everyone you meet in Law School isn’t your competition, but a potential ally. Learn to build meaningful relationships. Remember, legends don’t compete, they collaborate! 2. You’ll be having not-so-competent teachers teach you. We all face it. And not just

On Indianness: #Throwback to a long-forgotten tradition

“ आ नो भद्राः क्रतवो यन्तु विश्वतः ” – Rig Veda (Let noble thoughts come to me from all directions.) (In honour of the 5000-year old culture that taught me to de-contextualise and de-personalise every piece of wisdom.) The India that we get to see today came into being only in 1947, and later. Prior to that, the whole landmass that we refer to as India was never a part of a single empire, never had a uniform governance, evidently had a high-degree of socio-cultural as well as geographical diversity, and seemingly had no single feature which can be found to be common across the subcontinent. And yet, not only the outer world recognised this whole landmass as one, but the people inside somewhere had this feeling that they’re one – they belong to one! Interesting, but how? The whole subcontinent, throughout its history, no matter how diverse it was in its socio-cultural and political affairs, has always had a common essence – a common signature trait that was rar
Creative Commons License

All these articles are written by me and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License